Letter from Henry James to Lawrence Barrett
Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
Flag this item for
- Publication date
- 1843-1916
- Collection
- abernethycollection; middleburycollege; americana
- Language
- english-handwritten
This is a scanned version of the original document in the Abernethy Manuscripts Collection at Middlebury College.
- Addeddate
- 2016-02-10 21:39:31
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- aberms.jameshii.xx.08.11
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t55f2xs5v
- Language-statement
- Our collections and catalog records may contain offensive or harmful language and content that may be difficult to view. To learn more, read our statement on language in archival and library catalogs.
- Ocr
- tesseract 4.1.1
- Ocr_detected_lang
- en
- Ocr_detected_lang_conf
- 0.9994
- Ocr_detected_script
- Japanese
- Ocr_detected_script_conf
- 0.8011
- Ocr_module_version
- 0.0.11
- Ocr_parameters
- -l eng
- Pages
- 8
- Rights
- For questions or information about duplication, licensing, or copyright status for this item, please contact Special Collections, Middlebury College Library at specialcollections@middlebury.edu
- Rightsstatement
-
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
- Scanner
- Internet Archive Python library 0.9.8
- Transcriber
- Virginia Faust
- Transcription
(3 Bolton St. W.) 15 Esplanade, [underline] Dover: Aug. 11th [/underline] Dear Lawrence Barrett: Your letter (of the 28th) breathes so liberal a spirit that I am al- most ashamed to say I still find your proposal impracticable. [page break] I simply don't, & can't, see a [underline] play [/underline] in the "Portrait", & find my own conviction unsurmountable that such a play, at least, as I should desire to write, cannot come out of it. There are very fixed limits in regard to what i should be willing to do in the way [page break] of "going back", as it were, on the novel, by altering & working over the [strikethrough]?[/strikethrough] story as then put forth. Any very material changes would [savour?], to me, of parodying, or giving away, one's own production. A writer must see such a matter as this with his own eyes- if he is [page break] to see it at all, & I am afraid I shouldn't be able to see it with yours, even if we were to talk the matter over, great as are the inducements which you offer to such an effort. I thank you very kindly for the facilities you hold out for my coming over to look into the [page break] thing. Even if my state of mind (as to the particu- lar suggestion) were less sceptical, I should not be able to cross the water this year. Nor would I be able to get at the production of a play before January 1st. You see to what extent [---] conversations are against [page break] my throwing myself into your vision. I am afraid I can console myself & you (if [strikethrough]?[/strikethrough] you need consu- lation), only by saying, in a gene- ral way, that I should be glad to try something next year. But it would- n't, it couldn't, be the "Portrait".- I am not as yet prepared to say [page break] what it [underline] would [/underline] be, but I should [underline] probably [/underline] be pre- pared to write you a play, to take or to leave, as you should like it or not, on the chance that if you [underline] should [/underline] like it, it would open the door to my acquiring a goodish sum of money. This would leave us [page break] both our liberty, & the stake, for me, would be worth while. I will devote my- self meanwhile to thinking out a big situation, inter- national if possible; & if you don't hear from me it will be [strikethrough]?[/strikethrough] because I haven't been able to think of one big enough. Perhaps next year you will come this way? Ever faithfully Yours [underline] Henry James [/underline]
comment
Reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to
write a review.